The federal government is currently
negotiating two trade deals that could have great significance for drug pricing.
Negotiations for the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) have been ongoing
for several years and the Obama Administration is seeking to wrap up the
11-country deal by the end of 2013. While the agreed-to text of the TPP is
secret,
leaked negotiating
offers and past experience with similar treaties with Australia and Korea,
as well as recent cases under NAFTA, raise big concerns.
The TPP as well as the
Trans-Atlantic partnership, which begins negotiations next month, will likely
contain provisions that would empower foreign pharmaceutical corporations to
directly attack our domestic patent and drug-pricing laws in foreign tribunals.
Already under NAFTA, which does not contain the new rules proposed for TPP, drug
firm Eli Lilly has launched such a case against Canada, demanding $100 million
for the government's enforcement of its own patent standards - see
Fact sheet on NAFTA patent
case. In Australia, where a trade agreement similar to what is proposed in
the TPP has regulated drug pricing for several years, a
recent report shows price
hikes as a result. Read more on Australia's experience and the public health
community's concerns about the TPP
here. Closer
to home, the Maine Citizen Trade Policy Commission's
2012 assessment of trade
impacts focussed on the potential that the TPP would increase drug prices
generally and limit the operation of state Medicaid and other programs that
negotiate or set reference prices. See also NLARx Executive Director Sharon
Treat's
analysis of the leaked
text and its implications for state medicaid programs.
What can state legislators do? Get
involved! Call your members of Congress and ask if they have reviewed the TPP
text and understand the implications. Likely, they have not as the text is kept
under wraps and only recently has at least one member - Congressman Alan Grayson
- been able to
read it. Here
is a
resolution adopted by
NLARx in 2011 on trade and pharmaceutical policy; it remains relevant and
could be a model for resolutions in state legislatures.